March 29. By Willie Jones. [Opinion] As Executive Director of the Smithville Community Coalition (SCC), I was dismayed at the Opinion piece in Cornelius Today on March 6, 2023, by Thurman Ross. He has a right to his opinion. But we should distinguish his opinion from facts. A writer can say anything in an opinion piece without fear of fact-checking. The SCC Board of Directors has reviewed Mr. Ross’ allegations and believes there is no merit to the multiple allegations. This is the last time we expect to defend the SCC’s work in a forum without accountability.
Perhaps Mr. Ross is trying to resurrect his political career by grabbing a headline. He first presented the list of grievances at our February SCC community meeting, claiming that residents feel their voices are not being heard. So, we ask which residents have yet to be heard and what those residents would do differently?
The SCC has been working on this plan since 2017. We had more than 20 community meetings where we solicited input from community residents. We even did a door-to-door survey of all homeowners in Smithville, and around 90% of the homeowners supported the plan and the request to the County and the Town. The Plan is an anti-gentrification, anti-displacement, and redevelopment plan. We sought resources that would allow residents to continue to age in place safely. We also wanted resources to end the flooding from stormwater runoff damaging homes. Last, we want to repopulate the neighborhood by providing housing opportunities to the people working to improve our families’ lives.
The bright red line separating Mr. Ross and the SCC is whether a neighborhood, segregated, capital-starved, and redlined for a century, should seek funds to mitigate the impact of the disparate treatment. Smithville owners have been taxed for a century but did not receive tax revenue benefits. Mr. Ross believes disparate treatment is warranted and appropriate.
Now to the second question. What elements of Mr. Ross’s plan should we listen to or adopt? Oops! I forgot! He does not have a plan. Since the SCC started this effort to create a program in 2017, no alternative has been proposed. We still do not know what he would do differently. So far, he has clearly stated two objectives: (1) keep Smithville isolated and unconnected to Cornelius, and (2) stop purchasing vacant lots and blighted structures in Smithville. The net effect of those combined objectives is to leave Smithville as it is, a segregated enclave in Cornelius where the land is undervalued and a target for speculators.
Since signing our contract with the County in September 2022, the SCC has concentrated resources on the following.
- Negotiated a contract with the County to purchase blighted land and buildings. 2. We opened a new office on Catawba Ave.
- We have hired three new staff in addition to the Executive Director.
- We received approval from Planning Board and Town Board for the revitalization plan. 5. SCC has selected a development team to implement the first building phase homeownership component.
- The town of Cornelius agreed to do $3 million in infrastructure repairs and upgrades in Smithville.
- SCC has the first phase of land under purchase agreements.
- The single-family homes in Phase 1 are designed and priced by our design professional and builder.
- SCC has identified replacement housing for relocating families whose homes will be demolished. Once homes are built, these residents will have the first right to return to the site.
10.SCC has identified a contractor and will demolish the three vacant homes we purchased by May.
11.SCC is partnering with Habitat to do Critical Home Repairs for nine homes in this County budget cycle.
12.SCC has restarted our estate planning classes and is recruiting residents. 13.We partnered with Cain Center and the Town of Cornelius to do a Black History month program.
14.We organized the upkeep of the Community Garden.
Mr. Ross argues that the SCC should stop and listen to “the people.” He does not say that by stopping, about $10 million in resources are at risk. The $10 million includes infrastructure repairs and upgrades and eliminating lead from the public water lines. The $10 million also provides funds to repair homes owned by low-income seniors.
The SCC debated these issues with Mr. Ross for over two years. He was not persuasive and was unable to win over the majority in Smithville. Since he cannot win support based on the merits of his arguments, he turns to character assassination. Not only did he lose the debate in the community, but he was also unable to persuade County or Town elected officials.
We are on the clock to get all the work under contract by December 2024 and completed by December 2026. Otherwise, $6 million goes “poof.” The SCC has listened and will continue to listen to the residents, even the ones who disagree with the plan. If there is a disagreement, make it concrete and not hide behind “the people.”
Now let’s tackle the who. Mr. Ross provided a list with the addresses of the residents who joined the new organization. We reviewed the list and summarized it below.
- There has always been a handful of people opposed to the plan. This list includes several owners who need to clean up their property or like things the way they are for various reasons.
- The Smithville Revitalization Plan does not impact any of the addresses provided by Mr. Ross except for water and sewer repairs or replacements.
- One person is a renter of a house SCC purchased, and we are relocating her family because the house is a hazard, and the issue has been resolved.
- Three people have been approved for the Critical Repairs Program administered in partnership with Habitat.
- We know at least two residents who signed the petition because they did not want S. Hill St. opened because of possible noise and traffic. They otherwise support the plan. • Three addresses were vacant buildings.
- Five addresses were vacant land.
- Several addresses are renters.
- They did not list any seniors or others who support the Plan, which is a significant majority of the residents of Smithville.
For decades, Mr. Ross was one of Smithville’s leaders and voice of authority. He has been spectacularly ineffective in finding ways to bring resources to Smithville. Now that there are some resources and momentum, he re-emerges. He spread negative opinions on support for the plan and the people working to implement it. Now that we are making progress, he decides to make noise and position himself as a leader protecting the poor and powerless by continuing to starve Smithville of badly needed resources.
Please also note that in Mr. Ross’s diatribe, he never tells the readers what he stands for or his plan to revitalize the community. He does not propose ways to fix the problems facing his community. He constantly whines and complains until any substance is lost. We are not listening to him because he has no plan except to put him in charge and do what he says. Remember, this is a man with two decades of unmemorable public service.
Let me respond to some of their concerns:
- Mr. Ross advocates that we should stop and “listen to the people.” There is no shortage of conversations between our staff and residents of Smithville. Over the past three years, we have worked with residents to crystallize a vision for the future of Smithville and convince the County and the Town that the image is viable if the resources can be identified.
- Mr. Ross criticizes the SCC for having a film on our website with only four families speaking. The film was produced in partnership between the Cornelius Historical Society and the SCC. We contacted approximately ten residents, and those who agreed to participate were included.
- He objects to where the SCC staff members live. All three of our full-time staff have ties to the area; two live in Cornelius, and another grew up in Smithville. Mr. Ross lived in Smithville for 50 years or more and never found anyone with the skills to execute the revitalization.
- Mr. Ross asserts that “funding was shifted. Residents are now required to use Habitat for Humanity for critical repairs.” At no point did the SCC say that we would provide rehabilitation services to occupied homes in Smithville; instead, the County funded Habitat for the Critical Home Repairs program. The County increased its per-house allowance for Smithville because of the age of the homes. The first nine homes have been selected for the program. The SCC has no control over County or Habitat’s policies.
- The SCC did include a $250,000 Right of First Refusal program, where we purchase that right for $10,000. We have that program on our fundraising list and will continue to look for a sponsor.
- Today, vacancies are difficult to find, yet Mr. Ross blames SCC for the tight rental market. We must demolish three homes and will temporarily relocate those households off the site because there are no vacancies on the site. We are committed to paying relocation expenses for anyone who must be temporarily relocated. I cannot comment on the personal issues in relocating a particular family, but the woman he quoted was distraught at moving. Her house had structural damage from stormwater runoff and significant mold. The SCC purchased the home, and it became clear that her stay was dangerous to her family; therefore, she needed to be relocated. Whenever we own a property where residents’ safety and health are an issue, we will try to find a home that does not compromise residents’ health or safety.
- As far back as 2017, there were several discussions on the boundary of the plan. We agreed the program would focus on vacant land and blighted structures primarily south of Catawba Ave. Mr. Ross said back then that he did not support the plan and did not want us to include Burton Lane or North Ferry Street from the SCC plan. His home is on Burton Lane. However, he now says Burton Lane and North Ferry Street should have been included in the revitalization plan.
- Mr. Ross criticizes the SCC for not organizing classes on real estate, finance, and estate planning basics for residents. These classes were scheduled and contracted, and the dates had been established. The pandemic required us to pause because facilities could not be used for meetings. Since then, we have negotiated a new agreement with the same consultant, and those meetings are being organized now.
- He asserts that “college graduates and children who have gone on to successful careers” have been denied participation in planning the future of Smithville. When the SCC reorganized its Board of Directors last fall, the impending change was advertised, and we called several residents to ask them if they were interested. If they completed the board questionnaire, they were included in the final pool of candidates—no one meeting the description Mr. Ross has provided submitted the board questionnaire. Mr. Ross identifies two people, a business owner, and the former pastor at Union Bethel church, whom we did not add to the board. Both applicants publicly and consistently opposed the plan. Why would they want to join the leadership of an effort they disagreed with?
- The SCC is not accountable, according to Mr. Ross. We are responsible to the dozens of residents who helped craft the plan, which is the majority in Smithville. We have worked hard to strengthen the relationship with the Town. We have come a long way and developed trust between the Town and SCC. We meet regularly, and Town staff are available when we contact them. We also respond to their emails or calls within a day. We also have maintained a good relationship with the County and expect to return to them for additional funding in a few weeks.
- Mr. Ross was a Cornelius Town Commissioner for approximately 20 years. When we asked several Smithville residents to let us know what resources he has garnered for Smithville, we heard that he attempted to solve one of the stormwater drainage issues in
Smithville more than ten years ago. Still, that idea died of loneliness. There was no appropriation from the Town or County to address the acknowledged stormwater drainage problem. In his 20 years of service, he appears to have not convinced his fellow Town Board Members to spend any resources in Smithville. That is a description of an ineffective leader.
- A little over a year ago, in a meeting that included Mr. Ross, the Board of County Commissioners Chairman, the County Manager, the Mayor, a Town Commissioner, Town staff, and me, Mr. Ross, was asked several times to share his plan. He refused. He did not offer another approach for decision-makers to consider. In that meeting, we confirmed that SCC would only displace residents for infrastructure needs. That meeting opened the door to $3 million in County funding for Smithville and jumpstarted the discussions with the Town for new infrastructure and upgrades in Smithville.
The Planning Board and Town Board supported the Smithville Revitalization Plan. County and Town resources were pledged to the plan. Our contract with the County, which funds our land acquisition, was signed in September 2022. All current County funds must be under contract by December 31, 2024, and entirely spent by December 31, 2026. Those are nonnegotiable statutory deadlines. We have seen considerable progress since the contract was signed.
As for Mr. Ross, expect little from him. He is like a biennial flowering plant. He shows up to tell a new story every two years, even if the story is the same as the last 20 years. We have heard it all before. Just do not expect him to make a difference in your life.
The Board of Directors of the Smithville Community Coalition has reviewed and agreed with the contents of this statement.
Willie Jones, executive director
Smithville CommUnity Coalition
Board Members:
Jessica Boye
Clarence Miller
Justin Miller
Ron Potts
John Quinn
Lisa Mayhew-Jones
Ivy Harvell
Raquel Ramseur
Sammie Knox
Miriam Williams